Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4K Cubism Editor
- 1.2K Help
- 54 Tips and Tricks
- 200 Feature requests
- 53 Other Live2D Products and Tools
- 1 Cubism Viewer (for OW, for Unity)
- 3 Material Separation Photoshop Plug-in
- 49 Other Live2D Products and Tools (Other Photoshop Scripts, Sample Data, etc.)
- 302 Cubism SDK
- 266 Help
- 11 Tips and Tricks
- 25 Feature Requests
- 182 Community
- 40 General Discussions
- 10 Feature Requests
- 26 Projects, Showcase & Critiques
If you have any questions, reports, suggestions, or requests about Live2D, please send them to this forum.
※We cannot guarantee statements or answers from Live2D staff. Thank you for your understanding in advance.
Live2D Cubism
Cubism Products and Downloads
Cubism product manuals and tutorials
Cubism Editor Manual
Cubism Editor Tutorial
Cubism SDK Manual
Cubism SDK Tutorial
[Regarding macOS Tahoe](Updated October 16, 2025)
macOS v26 Tahoe is now supported!
We advise against upgrading your macOS at this time as it may cause Live2D products not to function correctly.
Upgrading macOS can also cause you to lose your Cubism Editor license file.
Please make sure to deactivate your Cubism Editor license before upgrading the macOS.
For more details:
https://help.live2d.com/en/other/other_09/
For inquiries regarding issues with license purchases or license activation errors, please contact us through the email form.
Error with deformer reflection inside parent deformer
- OS & Version: Windows 10
- PC Model: Lenovo L340
- Graphics Specifications: GeForce GTX 1050
- CPU: Intel Core i7-9750H
- Memory: 8GB
When doing reflections on a child deformer inside a parent deformer linked to the same parameter, it appears that the child deformers are not reflected properly in Live2D 4.1 and Live2D 4.2. I leave a link to a video explaining those errors.
youtu.be/5hsC6XQpvZw
These errors were not present in Live2D 4.0 and previous versions when I tried to reproduce them. I wanted to know if this is related to the Live2D software version or is it just happening me.
For the time being, I'll keep using version 4.0.
Answers
Thank you for your continued use of our product.
We apologize for any inconvenience caused.
Thank you for attaching the video.
Sorry, but the deformer is too small and difficult to understand.
I would appreciate it if you could capture the video so that I can see it larger and clearer.
The deformation of the deformer is large and easy to see.
Also, please capture with the log palette visible so that it is easy to check the error log status.
Best regards.
Sorry for the consecutive replies.
We have looked into this in detail and found that we had fixed the problem with the inversion function.
The behavior back in 4.0 was a glitch and the current behavior is the normal one.
Best regards!